DECORATIVE TURKEY CALL
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye Appeal, Artistic Beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness of Design, | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Ability to produce the sound of the animal or object the call is meant to mimic. | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound, It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye Appeal, Artistic Beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. Including finish on inside of bell. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. including finish on inside of bell | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. Including finish on inside of bell. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. Including finish on inside of bell. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. Including finish on inside of bell. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. Including finish on inside of bell. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Is striker functional | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic locator sounds | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Innovative design idea | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic animal sounds and or functionality of entry | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, Sanding, Gluing, Finish, Etc. Bases and displays will be judged. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, Originality and Creativity, Uniqueness in Design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic animal sounds and/or does it function well as intended | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Eye appeal, artistic beauty | 1 | 20 | 0.10 |
Craftsmanship, sanding, gluing, finish, etc. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ingenuity, originality and creativity uniqueness in design | 1 | 20 | 0.07 |
Sound. It must be capable of producing realistic turkey sounds, i.e. yelp, cluck, etc. | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Class or Contest Name | How contestants are entered | Prizes |
---|---|---|
1st Best of Class I - Division 1 | Winners from categories 1-9 | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
2nd Best of Class I - Division 1 | Winners from categories 1-9 and not 1st best of class winner in class 1 | $150.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
3rd Best of Class I - Division 1 | Winners from categories 1-9 and not 1st best of class and 2nd best of class winner in class 1 | $100.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
1st Best of Class II - Division 1 | Winners from Categories 10-15 and Category 24 | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
2nd Best of Class II - Division 1 | Winners from Categories 10-15 and Category 24 and not winner of 1st best of class in class 2 | $150.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
3rd Best of Class II - Division 1 | Winners from Categories 10-15 and Category 24 and not winner of 1st best of class or 2nd best of class in class 2 | $100.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
1st Best of Class III - Division 1 | Winners from Friction call categories 16-24 | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
2nd Best of Class III - Division 1 | Winners from Friction call categories 16-24 and not the winner of 1st best of class in class 3 | $150.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
3rd Best of Class III - Division 1 | Winners from Friction call categories 16-24 and not the winner of 1st best of class or 2nd best of class in class 3 | $100.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Earl Mickel Award winner | Class 1, class 2, and class 3 winners go up against each other | $3,000.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Grand National Championship Ring. |
Amateur Grand National Decorative Call Maker of the Year | Amateur entries from winners of categories 9, 15, and 21 | A ribbon with a medal. |
1st Best of Class IV - Division 1 | Matched Set and Best Overall Presentation Categories 25-26 | $500.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
2nd Best of Class IV - Division 1 | Matched Set and Best Overall Presentation Categories 25-26 And not the winner of first best of class | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
3rd Best of Class IV - Division 1 | Matched Set and Best Overall Presentation Categories 25-26 And not the winner of first best of class or second best of class | $125.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Youth Decorative Turkey Call Maker of the Year | This award will recognize an outstanding youth call maker 17 years of age or less | A ribbon with a medal. |
Grand National Champion of Champions | Decorative Awards for Category 28 | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
HUNTING TURKEY CALL
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds -- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds -- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds - i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds -- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds - i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds -- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds - i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce turkey-like sounds. Examples include, but are not limited to, yelp, cluck, kee-kee, cackle, cutting of the hen, purr, putt, gobble, tree call. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce turkey-like sounds- i.e. how simple or user-friendly the call is to use | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch and sound quality | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Break over or roll over | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Versatility: the ability to obtain a vast range of turkey like sounds i.e. both spring or fall type calls, gobbler or hen sounds, including the ability to sound like more than one turkey | 1 | 20 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce the sound of the animal or object the call is meant to mimic. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce the sound of the specific animal or object. | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch, and sound quality. | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Projection quality - i.e. loudness and clarity of the sound of the call. | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce the sound of the animal or object the call is meant to mimic. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce the sound of the specific animal or object. | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch, and sound quality. | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Projection quality - i.e. loudness and clarity of the sound of the call. | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Ability to produce the sound of the animal or object the call is meant to mimic. | 1 | 20 | 0.05 |
Ease of use to produce the sound of the specific animal or object. | 1 | 20 | 0.04 |
Tone, pitch, and sound quality. | 1 | 20 | 0.03 |
Projection quality - i.e. loudness and clarity of the sound of the call. | 1 | 20 | 0.02 |
Class or Contest Name | How contestants are entered | Prizes |
---|---|---|
Best of Show - NWTF GN Champion Call Maker of the Year - Division 2 | None | A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Grand National Championship Ring. |
Outstanding Youth Hunting Turkey Call Maker of the Year | None | A ribbon with a medal. |
Amateur Hunting Turkey Call Maker of the Year | Amateur entries from winners of categories 6, 11, 15 | A ribbon with a medal. |
Best of Class I - Division 2 | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Gibson Award. |
Best of Class II -Division 2 | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. D. D. Adams Award. |
Best of Class III - Division 2 | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Tom Turpin Award. |
Best of Class IV -Division 2 | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Charles L. Jordan Award. |
Grand National Champion of Champions | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Neil Cost Award. |
Don Chancey Award | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Best of Class V - Division 2 | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Jeremiah Stevens Award. |
DECORATIVE DUCK & GOOSE CALL
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Technical quality of workmanship and finish. | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Does design and medium compliment each other? | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Is design intent conveyed well and proportional | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Complexity and symmetry of checkered panels | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Overall checking ability | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Does design and medium compliment each other? | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Symmetry and complexity of pattern | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Quality of lamination and workmanship (finish) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Complimentary in design | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Technical quality of workmanship and finish. | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Does design and medium compliment each other? | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Is design intent conveyed well and proportional | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Does design and medium compliment each other? | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Technical quality of workmanship and finish. | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Does design and medium compliment each other? | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Is design intent conveyed well and proportional | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Complexity and symmetry of checkered panels | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall checkering ability | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Does design and medium compliment each other? | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Symmetry and complexity of pattern | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Quality of lamination and workmanship (finish) | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Artistry/artistic appeal in the essence of the species | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Is design accurate and proportional | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Artistry/artistic appeal (carving, checkering, lamination, etc.) | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Miniature detailing and proportions | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Complexity of design and technical quality of artistry | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Artistry/artistic appeal | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Is design intent conveyed well and proportional | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Artistry/artistic appeal | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Aesthetic decorative quality | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of craftmanship | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of sound reproduction. | 1 | 4 | 0.01 |
Overall appearance of call | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall judges opinion | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Quality of workmanship and finish | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Complimentary in design | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Class or Contest Name | How contestants are entered | Prizes |
---|---|---|
Grand National Youth Dec. Duck & Goose Call Maker of the Year | This is a test of lot's of "entries" and quotes. to see if this works | A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Grand National Amateur Dec. Duck & Goose Call Maker of the Year | Amateur entries from winners of categories 1, 2, 3 | A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Grand National Champion Call Maker of the Year - Best of Show - Division 3 | None | $1,500.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Grand National Championship Ring. |
Grand National Champion of Champions Award - Dec. Duck & Goose | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Champions of Champions Ring (winner may purchase). |
2nd Best of Show - Division 3 | None | $1,000.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
3rd Best of Show - Division 3 | None | $750.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Favorite Decorative Entry - Mark Warmath awarded | None | Acrylic Award. |
HUNTING DUCK & GOOSE CALL
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Complimentary in design | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Overall appearance and ease of use (calling as a set) | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Overall sound reproduction quality of duck call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Overall sound reproduction quality of goose call | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Quality of low-end calls (feed and set down) | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Quality of honk | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of mid-range and high-end calls (greeting, double cluck and hail) | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Quality of low-end calls (feed and set down) | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of honk | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of mid-range and high-end calls (greeting, double cluck and hail) | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of craftmanship | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Makers creativity | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Makers creativity | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Overall sound reproduction of each species | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Overall call design | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
High end ducky rattle that smooths out on top | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Bottom range sound ability (whisper) | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Good mid-range ducky rattle | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Easy loose feed chatter ability | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Top end volume | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Quality of craftsmanship and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Judged on the following criteria | Low Score | High Score | Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Quality of feed call | 1 | 10 | 0.05 |
Quality of individual quack | 1 | 10 | 0.04 |
Quality of hail call | 1 | 10 | 0.03 |
Quality of finish and construction | 1 | 10 | 0.02 |
Overall quality of sound reproduction | 1 | 10 | 0.06 |
Ease of use (calling) | 1 | 10 | 0.01 |
Class or Contest Name | How contestants are entered | Prizes |
---|---|---|
Grand National Champion Call Maker of the Year - Best of Show - Division 4 | None | $500.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. Grand National Championship Ring. |
2nd Best of Show - Division 4 | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
3rd Best of Show - Division 4 | None | $150.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
2018 Grand National Champion of Champions - Hunting Duck & Goose Call | None | $250.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. National Champion of Champions Ring (winner may purchase). |
Grand National Youth Hunting Duck Call Maker of the Year | None | A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Grand National Amateur Hunting Duck Call Maker of the Year | Amateur entries from winners of categories 1, 2, 3 | A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. |
Grand National Hunting Goose Call Maker of the Year | None | $500.00. A ribbon with a medal. A specialized Trophy. National Goose Call Champions Ring (winner may purchase). |
Favorite Hunting Entry - Mark Warmath awarded | None | Acrylic Award. |
Best Presentation - Mark Warmath awarded | None | Acrylic Award. |
Past and Present Participation - Mark Warmath awarded | None | Acrylic Award. |
Dennis C. Poeschel Design Award - Mark Warmath awarded | None | Acrylic Award. |